the rambling thoughts of a young filmmaker and the discoveries he makes through film, life, and everything in-between...
Showing posts with label Jesse Eisenberg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jesse Eisenberg. Show all posts
Sunday, September 29, 2013
1915 - Now You See Me
I am a sucker for a big flashy con-film - and throw together a cast like this and I'm all-in. It's the story of four-magicians brought together - why? They aren't entirely sure - but they're about to become Robin Hood-esque Magicians on a heist that even they don't understand.
To talk about this film properly requires me to go into SPOILER MODE. But before that I'll say - I liked it - I will absolutely see a follow-up if they make it (although it felt like this whole con had been someone's life's work) - but I did find that the characters were a little one note - and it was almost entirely plot based - nothing wrong with that - I just think the film could have been a lot richer otherwise.
Okay. Now SPOILERS...
You know that the film is going to end with the twist of us realizing that one of the characters is going be the mastermind - it's not going to be a new character - films don't do that. They kept pointing at the French lady (also this film seemed to have a bizarre racist slant agains the French...), so it's too obvious to make it her - she's the assistant - and Morgan Freeman's character is too obvious as well. Ruffalo seemed like the biggest twist, and so to me it only made sense to make it be him. That said, I just don't know about this twist - I'd have to re-watch the film to make sure it fit and wasn't just parlour tricks.
All that said, it was good popcorn entertainment and I will, indeed, take second helpings should they come my way.
Sunday, August 04, 2013
1879 - 30 Minutes or Less
I just wanted to watch something mostly mindless, and remembered this was on Netflix. I have to be honest, I find Danny McBride to be a pretty one-note actor - I can't say I've ever seen a lot of variety from his performances, and Aziz Ansari is about the same - that said you get what you get from them and here it works well enough. It's not the kind of film that's asking them to stretch their range to begin with.
Jesse Eisenberg plays a... well, he's not a loser or a burn-out, I guess he's just a guy who hasn't put any effort into his life and slums through as a pizza delivery guy. He's likable because he's played by Eisenberg, but really, he's got no goals, no aspirations. It's actually kind of difficult to get behind him as a character too much. He gets kidnapped, has a bomb strapped to him and is forced to rob a bank so that some people can use the money to pay someone to kill their father for the inheritance. It's a bit over-the-top, but again - it works for this kind of film.
I liked the film enough, it has some funny moments, but it exists within that slew of comedic films that comes out, gets seen and just kind of falls away. I'm not saying it's disposable, but there's very little that's substantial about it. It's just a fun little film. I don't mean to be ripping on it as much as I am, I'm just apparently in an overly critical state of mind right now...
Saturday, August 04, 2012
1756 - To Rome With Love
Full disclosure - I'm a Woody Allen nut. I didn't get to see this just as it came out as we were moving that weekend, so I was happy to catch it now. Woody has a wonderful ability to attract some of my favorite actors into his projects - and here he even scored two of my favorite Canadian actresses with Alison Pill and Ellen Page!
This is ensemble-Woody, and to be honest, it just wasn't my cup of tea. There was, as always, some wonderfully inspired comedic moments and lines, but all in all I just found it floudering a tad. It was a bit uneven and all over the place - four stories intercut - some taking place over weeks, others in a single day. Not that I can't get over that, but it just felt odd. And the thing felt a little heavy with exposition. I don't want to bag on Woody here since I love the bulk of his work (that might be even saying it lightly), but I have a hard time recommending this one. It's essentially about a slew of self-centered people who get to see what life is like on the other side (mostly by cheating on their spouses) and then get to return to their regular life consequence free when it doesn't work out. Catch it on Netflix if you're really curious.
This is ensemble-Woody, and to be honest, it just wasn't my cup of tea. There was, as always, some wonderfully inspired comedic moments and lines, but all in all I just found it floudering a tad. It was a bit uneven and all over the place - four stories intercut - some taking place over weeks, others in a single day. Not that I can't get over that, but it just felt odd. And the thing felt a little heavy with exposition. I don't want to bag on Woody here since I love the bulk of his work (that might be even saying it lightly), but I have a hard time recommending this one. It's essentially about a slew of self-centered people who get to see what life is like on the other side (mostly by cheating on their spouses) and then get to return to their regular life consequence free when it doesn't work out. Catch it on Netflix if you're really curious.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


